Epistemology, the study of what and how we come to know, is made up of different instructional methods and theories. If we take learning out of the human world, what do we find? Why does a bird fly? Is it because another bird was eaten from the nest when it didn't fly? Is it because it was born in a nest and can't get out otherwise? Is it because it has flown short periods successfully and wants to add to that? I understand that epistemology is the study of what and how humans come to know, but also question whether epistemology includes all people. I have worked with and loved people who are considered a few generations ago to be "uneducable". Even today, they are considered to be unable to learn. However, I have seen learning occur for these students. This is why I struggle with some of the more complex learning theories. I do, however, think that a researcher who chose to study people who others dismissed would define learning in a different way. Behavior theory focuses on positive and negative reinforcement. Cognitive Information Theory concedes to environment. Schema theory focuses on organizing information in ways that related in predictable ways. Situated learning focused on relies on social and cultural determinates. These are all theories of learning. Gagne chose to focus less on learning and more on instruction. He chose to include the various styles of learning into his definition of teaching: cognitive, affective and psychomotor. His definition did a better job including all people. Gagne defined categories of learning and events of instruction, which includes various levels of learning, and I feel includes even the lowest levels of learning.
Side note, as a learner, I embrace all instructional theories to some degree. I was the teacher's pet learner who constantly got comments on my self-motivation. It is only as a mom and teacher that I struggle with the definitions and theories. I have never taught a learner who was self-motivated. Generally speaking, my students do not care about grades. Honestly, neither do their parents. The parents of my students are concerned with forward motion. Basically, how can their learning help them in their future. I am not judging here. I am concerned with this as well. As a learner, I am a relativist. I believe that knowledge is mostly based on my frame of reference. I know that I learn better when the information is relative to my learning. I once did a report on Turkey. The one thing that I remember is that they are a mostly Christian country. Why do I remember this? That is the one fact that I related to. It is only as a teacher that I am a positivist. As a teacher, I apply behaviorist principles. I believe that positive and negative reinforcement change learning completely. Without the principles of behaviorism, I would struggle to add education to my classroom. My positive reinforcements create an environment where learning occurs. These beliefs are a constant conflict within me. I was not a learner who required reinforcement. The most common description of me as a learner was "self-motivated". The general description of my students does not include the description of self-motivated.
I worry about the differences in behaviorist and constructivist perspectives. I understand that the general principles of teaching is to teach the future of our society to think for themselves. This is a real concern as a society. I also worry that the general principles of teaching leaves behind an amazing group of people. These people do not likely study the of teaching, but deserve to be a part of the research that is occurring in learning and education. I also recognize that as a teacher of people who are amazing learners when provided with the proper motivation, I truly believe in motivation. While higher-level learners might be self-motivated, few people with specific disabilities are self-motivated. As a teacher of people with disabilities, I believe in motivating my students. Without motivation being presented to my students, I do not think they would learn. So, everyday I work to motivate my students to learn, in an effort to earn rewards (that I have set up specific to that student). This is how I have become a very effective teacher of students who have struggled under other teachers.
Cristi,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your blog, it made me think. I have encountered people who were thought to be unable to learn, when in reality the instructor was unable to change their teaching to accommodate the student, or unwilling to take the time to evaluate the student properly. I was a Therapeutic Foster Parent for 10 years and I had children in my home that were labeled failure to thrive, autistic, and who suffered from ADHD, many times the children had been unable to succeed in school due to their situation. The home life of a child has much influence on the child’s ability to succeed; it is difficult to be motivated when your life is in turmoil. I applaud you for using different strategies in the classroom, and I agree that all students need motivation, but they also need both positive and negative reinforcements because many of them only receive those reinforcements in the school setting.
Good Evening, I loved reading your blog! I always enjoy reading blogs and learning others views. One thing I noticed while reading your blog, I see the same issues with my job as you do with your. I understand there are always student and parent concerns with furthering education. Sometimes I wonder how we can get our students and parents self motivated to work hard enough to learn.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading your post this week. You highlight many important points that I had never really stopped to consider before. I think that you touched on a very important point when you talk about how motivation is an important factor when it comes to your students learning. As you pointed out, some students are "self-motivated" and tend to excel on their own, but some need motivation like positive reinforcement to help them to progress. From reading your post, I can tell that you are clearly a dedicated teacher and I applaud the work that you are doing. You are truly having a positive impact on the lives of your students.
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your post. Your connection to special education really hit home with me. In my science classes, I have students of all learning levels and abilities so it is very important to me that I teach ALL of my kids so that they can ALL be successful.
ReplyDeleteSeveral years ago, I had a student who was in special education for reading and math and he really struggled in both areas. He had decided that instead of trying, because he felt he would fail anyway, he would rather act out and be a behavior problem. He quickly realized that his way would not work in my room because if he did not follow the rules he would miss out on fun stuff which he really loved. He was one of my best kiddos that year. He ended up making a 98 on his Science TAKS test (which was not a modified test in any way!) meaning he had only missed 1 question out of 40! He received an award for his accomplishment. Needless to say, after that he knew that he was much more capable than he first thought he could be!